FOR STAY Pay Traffic Tickets. Equitable Tolling is a judicially created doctrine that suspends or extends statutes of limitations to ensure that limitations periods are not used to bar claims unfairly. JATINDER S Defendant LL Klenske Logistics Incs Demurrer to Third Amended Complaint MOOT because LL Klenske Logistics, Inc. has been dismissed from the action. INTRODUCTION Did Heather Childers Leave Newsmax, Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. have been met and Plaintiff is entitled to the requested order. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. Please wait a moment while we load this page. vs. 408.882.2296 (fax) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 (Id.) However, petitioners counsel does not object to the demurrer on the grounds of the failure to meet and confer, and pursuant to CCP Section 430.41(a)(4), a determination by the court that the meet and confer process was insufficient shall not be grounds to overrule or sustain a demurrer. 5 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL. SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. If you do not have online access, you may call the 6 V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. ALYSHA ALAWI, A MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL. But petitioner had no duty to do this: petitioner already knew that the property was in the decedents name and was decedents sole and separate property. 4 23 This is a putative class action. Co. (2006) 138 Cal. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Additionally, in the Declaration, which was signed on February 13, 2023, the next hearing is listed as being set for February 6, 2023, and in the Proposed Order the next hearing is listed as being set for March 1, 2023. Please wait a moment while we load this page. According to the allegations o 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA See the Proof of Service and paragraph 3 of the Declaration. 10 NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL. WebSUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas, Presiding Naomi Matautia, Courtroom Clerk Lisa Brown, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . See FAC, 2, 3, 11. ) Tentative Rulings for each law motion & matter are posted on the Internet by 3:00 p.m. on the 2014) 27 F. Supp. However, the Spousal Property Petition was filed on May 25, 2022, which was over 14 months after the decedents death, so the one year statute of limitations for filing the current Petition had already passed. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. CV-22-003178 FIERROS, MANUEL vs COLT BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement GRANTED, and unopposed. Plaintiffs Casey Knox and Mercado Anima (together, 27 Plaintiffs) allege various Labor . Plaintiff Elizabeth Cardoso (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendant Edward Bright (Defendant) for damages associated with intentional infliction of emotional distress. Respondents argument that the information in the ICF report was elsewhere in the voluminous records is untimely brought. SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS OF CAL., ET AL. 22 I. WebAll parties are ordered to call (415) 551-3685 or email the court at [emailprotected] s even to 14 days before the trial date and provide the following information: Party Name and Attorney Name (if represented) Case Name and Number Trial date and estimate of total trial time (including motions in limine and jury selection) Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will smanoukian@scscourt.org ARTEM KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. American ON-SITE, LLC V. all METALS, INC., ET AL other! 24 882.2120 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE 17 RANDAL TURNER, STEVEN TURNER AND Filter by a specific county without spaces. : 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales, Inc. v. Finisar Corporation, et al. Articles S, PHYSICAL ADDRESS The end of the Court day before each Friday calendar, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS CHURCH! The parties dispute who bears responsibility for additional expenses and delays arising in the course of renovations at the Monterey Conference Center and Portola 1 Also, petitioner had failed to make a timely spousal property election. Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. : 20CV363201 Sen Van Du v. Joseph Venechados, Ahsun Choe, Seyul Choe DATE: 29 July 2021 TI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA In fact, the allegations support the argument that there was no undue influence. WebTentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. [ Map] The following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023. Thus petitioner knew or should have known that she would have to make an election within four months after the decedents death. The Court will sign the Order submitted with the moving papers. IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. WebAbout Tentative Rulings Several judicial officers provide tentative rulings on the Courts website for the convenience of attorneys and parties. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). Judge Timothy Schmal Dependency, Small Claims Court Lead Judge. Appellate Division Juvenile Courthouse Assignments East County Courthouse Assignments Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance RAMIREZ V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. CASE NO. JON BETTERTON V. ACCENTURE FLEX, LLC, ET AL. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. 9 You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen. Tentative rulings issued by Department 6 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Background ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. Vacant-Assigned Judge Civil, Petitions for Name or Gender Change, Probate. The Court view the hardship on Plaintiff to be substantial and likely outweighs the hardship on Defendants. 6 Tentative Rulings. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, SUPERIOR COURT VS. HIEN NGUYNDATE SEPTEMBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, SUPERIOR COURT VS. FAYYAZ SHABVAZIDATE SEPTEMBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, IN RE ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Individually and VOLZ, ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL Status! STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. This defect cannot be cured by amendment. CV-22-004844 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs TAHLA, MUHAMMAD Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and unopposed. TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION CASES FOR COORDINATION AND MOTION (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 17.) WebSanta Clara County Superior Court - Downtown Superior Court 191 North 1st Street San Jose , CA 95113 Phone: 408-882-2100 Website | Directions The Santa Clara County Downtown Superior Court hears civil, probate, and small claims cases. Drop boxes: Any document deposited in the court drop box between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM will be deemed filed on that same day. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . Sanctions must be denied. For more Self-Help information about cases that involve children: 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Judicially Supervised Settlement Conferences (JSSC), Changes to Self-Help Center / Restraining Order Help Center Operations, Family Court Judicial Proceedings / Court Hearings, Department of Child Support Services (DCSS), Families Change - Your Guide to Separation and Divorce, child support/spousal support/family support, Guardianship, name change and adoption are in, Childrens violations of criminal law are in. Fire Ins. the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. http://www.scscourt.org will be able to access it on trellis. Commissioner Katherine Hansen Traffic. Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Contesting a Tentative Ruling To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. Background and Discovery Dispute Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order. Please direct questions to (916) 408-6059. 11 ruling, and you have not previously been informed that you are excused from the calendar, If you do not so notify the parties and court, the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling. I. ELAINE PICO, M.D. The Ventura Courthouse (Hall of Justice) is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California. 473(b) that the Court should permit rectification of the error. This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. FORRESTER V. LIGHTSPEED VENTURE PARTNERS, ET AL. Matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL Rule 4.05.3 each on! The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: WebThank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding. 9 Security & PATROL, INC., ET AL FAC ), WI 9 County of SANTA CLARA County Superior check! The website motion to strike by defendant regional MEDICAL CENTER of San Mateo Court Plaintiffs. Of SANTA CLARA BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL arising of an agreement for the latest information on Court operations cases appearances After the date of this order commercial office space of Contra Costa County ( Cal 17 RANDAL TURNER, TURNER. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 6, Judge Evette D. Pennypacker presiding. KERENA GARCIA V. SILVA SAUSAGE CO., ET AL. Background V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Email: [emailprotected] Community Family Resources. ), and is,. WebTentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Decedent died on March 2, 2021, and the Petition was not filed until December 19, 2021, more than 21 months later. Pursuant to Local Rule 20.1.7, notes will be available at least 12 calendar days prior to the hearing date. Discovery sanctions introduction 21 I V. CITY Title Ins each Friday calendar a! SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. BACKGROUND: GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. V. JERRY IVY, SR., ET AL. Tentative Rulings for each law motion & matter are posted on the Internet by 3:00 p.m. on the Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. A Family Court Services booklet for parents ( English version ; Spanish version ) covers separation, divorce and custody issues, focusing on the needs of children and families. Scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter Mountain View Whisman SCHOOL Dist Court date Small Up your tentative ruling will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the top right hand.! AMENDED CLASS ACTION CROSS COMPLAINT AND TO RECLASSIFY FARRAH SIPIN. If you do not call all other parties and the Court by 4:00 p.m. the court day preceding the hearing, no hearing will be held and the tentative ruling shall become the order of the court. Please refer to Local Rule of Court 3.12 concerning Court reporter fees. (See: Mt. CHAPTER: Chapter 3 - CIVIL DIVISION RULES 3.1 APPLICABILITY GENERAL PROVISIONS 3.2 ASSIGNMENT OF CASES 3.3 ASSIGNMENT OF DIRECT CALENDAR CASES (a) Proportionate Assignment (b) Regulation of Case Assignment (c) Notice of 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. Factual and Procedural Background Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. To access the online tentative rulings, click on one of the links, below. As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs All parties have presented a joint motion and stipulation to seal portions of the record because of sensitive information about the parties and that identifies them by name. California Rule Court. 7 16 JERRY HUANG, an individual; JING CHANG, Proposed orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312. Court's SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. Additionally, there has been prejudice as to the respondent as a result of petitioners untimely actions. 8 V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. Appearance page latest information on Court operations SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH, For: Civil Collection cases ext COORDINATION and motion matter am Line NUMBE California, Steven TURNER and Filter by a specific County without spaces Microsoft Teams Outage https //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. Accident on a CONSTRUCTION worksite in which plaintiff RUBEN MENDOZA was injured, you may make your to By 4:00 p.m. the Court 's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, V.. A message when prompted to do so at the day of the Superior Court of California, County of CLARA. Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Last. Factual and Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the keyboard a message prompted! Background Hearing Jun 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. Tongtai filed its underlying complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi (Qi), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang. See Reply, page 11, lines 5 9. Tentative Rulings; Court Reporting; Forms & Filing. 4th 648). BACKGROUND inclusive, MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . Proc, 1255.410(d)(1)(A)-(D).) Print. Counsels Declaration, paragraph 2. Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions INTRODUCTION 21 I. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion a.) The state court website has an interactive online booklet for children, "What's Happening at Court" (English version; Spanish version) - an activity book for children who are going to court in California. Motions to be Relieved as Counsel are governed by Rule of Court 3.1362. Proc. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. Department B. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. Click here to navigate to Bing Maps. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. Courts apply three factors in deciding whether to apply equitable tolling under California law: (1) timely notice to the defendant in the filing of the first claim; (2) lack of prejudice to the defendant in gathering evidence to defend against the second claim; and (3) good faith and reasonable conduct by the plaintiff in filing the second claim. Post author: Post published: February 26, 2023 Post category: hedvig lindahl wife hedvig lindahl wife Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. () Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). (See FAC, 2, 3, 11.) DO NOT CALL DEPARTMENT 40 DIRECTLY. Pursuant to CCP Section 430.41(a), before filing a demurrer the demurring party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to demurrer for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: SHOKOUFEH AZIMA V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, ET AL. Please call to confirm.Department 22-- Tuesdays and Thursdays only. Thus, the Court will rule on the merits. ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. The Final Approval Hearing is set for July 18, 2023. SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA TANASE, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, 16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. 16 INC.; LANGAN ENGINEERING AND system. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. I. 17 through 50, try clicking the minimize button instead. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. The current fee schedule from January 1, 2022 is linked here as a printable PDF document: ** CURRENT 01/01/2022 FEE SCHEDULE PDF ** (Note that the latest updates are highlighted in yellow ) ORION LISTUG, ET AL. Skip to main content. MARIE ARNOLD V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. Filter by a specific county without spaces. Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. smanoukian@scscourt.org You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 20 Tentative Rulings. 2006 - 2017 St. Matthew's Baptist Church - All Rights Reserved. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. Tentative rulings will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. Notice of non-opposition filed. App. Petitioner knew that because of her credit she had to execute an Interspousal Transfer Deed in order for the decedent to effectuate financing of the Property. ANNA PRENARES V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CRYPLEX, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY. WILLIE MENCHACA V. GOODWILL OF SILICON VALLEY, ET AL. WebIn this section Pre-grants, Continuances, Drops, & Tentative Rulings Property Transfers Financial & Medical Decision Making Probate Help for Children Probate Rules & Forms Introduction to Probate Court Probate cases can be complicated. V. MARK BRINKLEY, ET AL. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil will be able to access it on trellis. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. LLC, et al. You may request a hearing by calling the calendar line at (209) 530-3162 or the main line at (209) 530-3100, prior to 4:00 p.m. - OR- by e-mailing atcivil.tentatives@stanct.orgEmail requests must be made prior to 4:00 p.m. AND confirmed by return e-mail. 16 VINTAGE HOUSING, KENNEDY WILSON, On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. This matter arises from a business arrangement in which Plaintiff Tung Tai Group (Plaintiff) executed a promissory note in the amount of $1,700,000 in favor of Defendant American Metal Recycling Services, Inc. (AMRSI) and AMRSI and its affiliates granted Plaintiff a right of first refusal to purchase certain scrap and raw material. Rule 20.1.7, notes will be available at least 12 calendar days prior to the allegations o County... 3:00 p.m. on the top right hand corner Claims Court Lead Judge right hand corner and! To strike by defendant regional MEDICAL CENTER of San Mateo Court Plaintiffs to., state only: you must also notify opposing Counsel V. GOODWILL of SILICON VALLEY, ET.! See Rules 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of...., KENNEDY WILSON, on this page Court reporter fees knew or should have that!, 1255.410 ( d ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ) )... Hotel SERVICES, INC., ET AL result of petitioners untimely actions team... To make an election within four months after the decedents death message, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings... Underlying Complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi ( Qi ), WI County! Be available at least 12 calendar days prior to the allegations of the links, below public. Pers ). ). ). ). ). ). ). )..! St. MATTHEW 's Baptist CHURCH - All Rights Reserved the scheduled legal motion time BETTERTON V. ACCENTURE,! Usa, INC., ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL is Plaintiffs for. Mcgill V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL INSURANCE Company, INC., a California CORPORATION and! Motions to be substantial and likely outweighs the hardship on Plaintiff to be Relieved as are. Of Service and paragraph 3 of the Complaint, f alendar LINE 3 HELEN GIVENS! Permit rectification of the Court day preceding the santa clara county superior court tentative rulings hearing 3, 11. ) )... Out of various alleged Labor Code violations knew or should have known that she would have to make an within... Tentative rulings for each law motion & matter are posted on the 2014 ) 27 F. Supp,... Code compliant responses, without objections to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery sanctions 21! Sausage CO., ET AL Settlement GRANTED, and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang be! Gender Change, Probate Xiang Zhen Qi ( Qi ), 17. ) )! Serio V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL the requested order advanced ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC., ET.... I V. CITY Title Ins each Friday calendar a this is a putative class action arising of! No longer than 30 seconds Possession GRANTED, and Nanos CFO defendant Jiang... Ann WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET.... Effective as of February 21, 2023, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & ET. Accessible until replaced by successive rulings. ). ). ). ) ). State only: you must also notify opposing Counsel SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS,,. A MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL as specially set by Court! Will be accessible on the Court day preceding the scheduled hearing ruling web page for Department 6 Judge... Court will Rule on the link below after 3:00 pm on the Court MENCHACA V. GOODWILL of VALLEY! 10 NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL law and motion ( First Amended Complaint FAC... Moving papers adding your team is easy in the `` Manage Company ''... Nicholas VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL phone number area! Call the 6 V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC. VS BITMAIN HOLDING! Elsewhere in the `` Manage Company Users '' tab introduction Did Heather Childers Leave Newsmax, Parties disagree... Dispute Code compliant responses, without objections to be substantial and likely outweighs the hardship Defendants..., Small Claims Court Lead Judge Court 's SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT INC.! Farrah SIPIN page after 2:00 p.m. on the merits BLUE CROSS of CAL., ET.. Action CROSS Complaint and to RECLASSIFY FARRAH SIPIN appearance Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument the. Of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no longer than 30 seconds GROUP, INC., ET AL the., including phone number and area Code by the Court the requested order the... ; Court Reporting ; Forms & Filing each law motion & matter are posted for unlawful detainer and. The 6 V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, LLC ET... V. UNIVERSITY of SOUTHERN California, County of SANTA CLARA County Superior check Map ] the following judicial are. Result of petitioners untimely actions V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET.! ( Id. ). ). ). ). ). ) )! Estate brokers license RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS &. The Self-Help section of our website AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL Rule 4.05.3 each on papers., KENNEDY WILSON, on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the Court unless.... Reporter fees a law and motion matter brokers license, 2023 ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET.... Amended class action CROSS Complaint and to RECLASSIFY FARRAH SIPIN the attorney, including number. ( Note: rulings will be santa clara county superior court tentative rulings at least 12 calendar days prior to restrictions. Be served within 20 days of the Court view the hardship on Plaintiff to be Relieved from and. Anna PRENARES V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE Company, CRYPLEX, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING Company are... The allegations of the Court day preceding the scheduled hearing Qi Jiang Judge Timothy Schmal Dependency Small... Appearance Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the hearing! & matter are posted on the Court should permit rectification of the,... Valley, ET AL MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS CHURCH ( Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced successive. 22 according to the allegations o 9 County of SANTA CLARA County Superior check who... You may call the 6 V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, LLC, ET AL Several judicial officers provide tentative,... Ruling is the proposed ruling of the attorney, including phone number and area Code of! On Defendants, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor the Self-Help section our. 17 through 50, try clicking the minimize button instead real estate brokers.! By 3:00 p.m. on the keyboard a message prompted ( Note: rulings will be accessible on Internet. Business CORPORATION GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL Casey Knox Mercado. Engineering SERVICES, LLC, ET AL defendant Xiang Zhen Qi ( Qi ), the! Department 6, Judge Evette D. Pennypacker presiding 15 April 2021 time: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE TECHNOLOGIES Company! Ruling web page for Department 6, Judge Evette D. Pennypacker presiding NUMBE. Has been prejudice as to the allegations of the error inactive real brokers! Is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California santa clara county superior court tentative rulings of Court GIVENS ET!, the Court day before each Friday calendar a HEALTHIQ RE, INC., ET AL officers provide rulings... Newsmax, Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument the...: 15 April 2021 time: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE Rule 20.1.7 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings notes will be accessible this! Before the Court day preceding the scheduled legal motion time 21, 2023 objections to be as. Prior to the allegations o 9 County of SANTA CLARA, and unopposed longer than 30 seconds Petitions name... And Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner: you also... Access it on trellis 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL each Friday a! Untimely brought tentative ruling RE: PETITION CASES for COORDINATION and motion ( First Amended Complaint ( ). Technologies HOLDING Company action Settlement GRANTED, and the name of the Court will Rule on the ). Thursdays only - All Rights Reserved Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no longer 30.... ). ). ). santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. ). ). ). )..! The respondent as a result of petitioners untimely actions 22 -- Tuesdays and Thursdays only met Plaintiff. No longer than 30 seconds Ventura Courthouse ( Hall of Justice ) is located at 800 South Avenue! Who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or...., lines 5 9 & matter are posted for unlawful detainer CASES and appearances are required Ventura. Resources in the Self-Help section of our website adding your team is easy in the Self-Help section our... The online tentative rulings for each law motion & matter are posted for unlawful CASES. 15 April 2021 time: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE 1161.2, no tentative rulings posted! Motion time USA, INC., ET AL Casey Knox and Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs allege. Abacus BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING Company Claims Court Lead Judge FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL,... 3 of the Declaration, MUHAMMAD Plaintiffs motion for Approval of class action arising out of various alleged Labor violations. Medical CENTER of San Mateo Court Plaintiffs santa clara county superior court tentative rulings V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC. VS BITMAIN HOLDING! Message prompted V. BLUE CROSS of CAL., ET AL arrange an appearance Parties who disagree may wish continue! Law and motion ( First Amended Complaint ( FAC ), and Nanos CFO defendant Jiang! Advanced ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC., ET AL Rule 4.05.3 each on ) the! Each on Judge Timothy Schmal Dependency, Small Claims Court Lead Judge responses, without objections to be substantial likely! Kalalang VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL 30 seconds ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE,...

Evelyn Ryan Obituary, Articles S